Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Under 23's Championship
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to International Pro Wrestling: United Kingdom. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- British Under 23's Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Though at first glance I see notability, but there are no references within the article besides a few external links and they all appear to be primary, beside one. While my search on Google didn't show me any reliable references that I am aware of. They all seemed to only be fan sites, etc. If this is as important as it is foretold in the article, then there should be a few third party refs.--WillC 15:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —WillC 15:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A young championship with virtually no history of defences and just one champion. Fails WP:N badly. RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 22:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - into the article of the promotion (International Pro Wrestling: United Kingdom). No need to delete the information. Merging fits with precents set in discussions of other minor titles. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - as above. Hate to lose the information for a title that may reach notability in the future. --- Paulley (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, per above. Nikki♥311 18:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The question is who will merge it?--WillC 18:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merging is easy, and anyone can do it. I'll take the responsibility for this one, if that's what the final decision is. Nikki♥311 18:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it is and you need any help or anything give me a shout. --- Paulley (talk) 19:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merging is easy, and anyone can do it. I'll take the responsibility for this one, if that's what the final decision is. Nikki♥311 18:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —WillC 18:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - but it should be removed completely if it doesn't expand over the next couple of years. Mad Dog Dunstan (talk) 11:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.